Accelerated Innovation

Ship High-Performing GenAI Solutions, Faster...

A Deep Dive into Preventing LLM Overreliance

Workshop
Are users treating LLM outputs as authoritative answers instead of decision support?

As GenAI becomes embedded in workflows, overreliance can erode human judgment, amplify errors, and introduce subtle but systemic risk. 
To win, your GenAI solutions must actively counter overreliance through validation loops, thoughtful UI design, and clear context cues.

The Challenge

When LLM outputs are consumed uncritically, risk accumulates quietly across decisions. 
• Invisible overreliance: Teams struggle to detect when users defer judgment entirely to model outputs. 
• Weak validation loops: Workflows fail to encourage verification, second opinions, or contextual checks. 
• Automation bias: Interfaces and defaults nudge users toward accepting model recommendations without scrutiny. 
These patterns lead to poor decisions, compliance exposure, and misplaced trust in automated outputs. 

Our Solution

In this hands-on workshop, your team designs practical safeguards against LLM overreliance through guided analysis and applied exercises. 
• Detect patterns of over-reliance on model outputs across workflows and user behaviors. 
• Design validation and judgment loops that require human review at appropriate decision points. 
• Evaluate user interface patterns that promote critical thinking instead of blind acceptance. 
• Apply techniques to reduce automation bias in decision-making contexts. 
• Embed disclaimers and contextual cues that clearly communicate model limitations. 

Area of Focus

Detecting Over-Reliance on Model Outputs 
Encouraging Validation and Judgment Loops 
Designing User Interfaces for Critical Thinking 
Reducing Automation Bias in Decision-Making 
Embedding Disclaimers and Context Cues 

Participants Will

• Identify where and how users over-rely on LLM-generated outputs. 
• Introduce validation steps that reinforce human judgment. 
• Design interfaces that encourage critical evaluation of model responses. 
• Reduce automation bias in GenAI-assisted decisions. 
• Leave with concrete patterns to rebalance trust between humans and models. 

Who Should Attend:

Product ManagersUX/UI DesignerSolution ArchitectsGenAI EngineersRisk and Compliance Leaders

Solution Essentials

Format

 Virtual or in-person 

Duration

4 hours 

Skill Level

Intermediate 

Tools

 UI patterns, workflow examples, and guided evaluation exercises 

Build Responsible AI into Your Core Ways of Working